Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan has filed an appeal in the Supreme Court challenging the Lahore High Court’s (LHC) rejection of his bail petitions in eight cases connected to the May 9 violence. The cases include allegations related to the attack on Lahore’s Jinnah House. The LHC had dismissed his pleas last month, upholding an earlier decision by an anti-terrorism court (ATC) in November 2024.
Khan’s Defense: Lack of Evidence & Contradictions
In his petition, Khan contends that the FIRs lack substantial evidence tying him to the riots. He argues that since he was in NAB custody at the time, his participation was impossible. The appeal also highlights inconsistencies in prosecution statements and questions the police’s delayed action, suggesting possible mala fide intent. Khan has demanded further investigation, claiming the case against him is politically motivated.
Legal Proceedings & Previous Rulings
A two-member LHC bench, led by Justice Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, had reserved its verdict on June 24 after hearing arguments from both sides. The court ultimately upheld the ATC’s earlier decision to deny bail. Khan’s legal team, however, maintains that the evidence is insufficient, pointing out that other co-accused have already been granted bail in the same cases.
Broader Implications
The appeal now places the spotlight on the Supreme Court, which will determine whether Khan’s detention is justified or if procedural flaws warrant his release. The outcome could have significant political ramifications, given Khan’s status as a former prime minister and the ongoing tensions between PTI and state institutions. Legal experts are closely watching whether the top court will intervene in what has become one of Pakistan’s most contentious legal battles.
